Evidence. Care. Accountability.Contact the desk
Our standards

Research explained

BPC-157 and pharmacologically altered pupil size

Pupil response is not evidence of improved vision or safe treatment of an eye disorder.

On this page

Evidence dossier

The report behind the claim

The investigators reported modification of experimentally induced pupil changes. Pupil response is not evidence of improved vision or safe treatment of an eye disorder.

NO system dependence of atropine-induced mydriasis and L-NAME- and L-arginine-induced miosis: Reversal by the pentadecapeptide BPC 157 in rats and guinea pigs.

Design
Experimental animal investigation with the intervention and outcomes specified in the indexed abstract.
Participants or model
Rats and guinea pigs receiving atropine and nitric-oxide modifiers
Endpoint
Pupil diameter and time course of drug responses
Finding on record
The investigators reported modification of experimentally induced pupil changes.
Limits of inference
Pupil response is not evidence of improved vision or safe treatment of an eye disorder.
Read the publication

The experiment in view

The study used rats and guinea pigs receiving atropine and nitric-oxide modifiers. Its principal measures were pupil diameter and time course of drug responses. The investigators reported modification of experimentally induced pupil changes.

Reading the result closely

Changing a pharmacologic pupil response might be undesirable when dilation is needed for examination. An effect has to be evaluated against its intended purpose before it is called a benefit. The ocular route also makes formulation and local safety questions especially important.

The boundary of the finding

Pupil response is not evidence of improved vision or safe treatment of an eye disorder.

Related evidence, kept separate

Retinal injury after nitric-oxide inhibition examines retinal vessels, pressure, behavior and histology over four weeks. Here, the measured endpoint was pupil diameter and time course of drug responses. Those outcomes belong to separate experiments; one is not a replication or a human confirmation of the other. Compare that distinction with the BPC-157 and corneal anesthesia: shorter numbing is not better human eye care appraisal.

On the record

The documents supporting this report.

  1. BPC-157 and pharmacologically altered pupil size — original indexed research

The continuing record

More from the report

Before you leave

One more option to compare.

Another provider review

We may earn a commission from qualifying provider referrals. Affiliate placements are labeled Partner. How we are funded

Continue to your choiceRead another review